Friday, 5. October 2012 - 18:00 - Sunday, 7. October 2012 - 13:00

 

The privatisation in the seed industry is moving on unimpeded and the boundaries of meaningful privatisation and concentration have been crossed since long. Only ten international seed companies control more than 75 percent of the worldwide commercially trade seed, through patents or laws for varietal protection. The creation of private ownership rights in the hands of few demonstrates in a glaring manner, how the trend of the formation of monopolies negatively affects biological diversity and innovation in plant breeding. An increasing number of voices are being raised, also from breeders, that see in the overemphasis of intellectual property rights an impediment to innovation development. Breeders complain more and more about lack of access to basic materials for genetic improvements.

Encouraging counter-models focussing on the creation of common goods are still at an infant stage. This includes international sets of regulations such as the seed convention with farmers rights, the convention on biodiversity with the access and benefit sharing regime and the Interlaken Convention with the demand for Livestock Owners Rights.

At the same time, there are a number of initiatives, which endeavour to maintain or develop seed or animal races as common goods. This poses the question, how these alternative approaches can be designed conceptionally, legally secured and turned into a power base. This does not only refer to the creation of say varieties to be registers as common goods, but also to maintaining the character of commons for subsequent generations.

For about 10 year, under the term of "Bio-Linux", the idea to take up the principle of open source developed for information technology, also in the area of genetic resources, to apply the principles for the development of seed, and to develop corresponding procedures. Thereby, important questions are:

  • how can the Copy-left principle be realised in plant breeding

  • which possibilities are there to sell seed (to be able to finance future breeding) and, at the same time, maintain its common source character

  • how could a Bio-Linux look like

During our AGRECOL-Weekend in October, we tackled these, and other questions.

The programme was

Fr. 17:00       Registration, Coffee/Tea

Fr. 17.30       Welcome, Introduction to the theme

Fr. 18:30       Supper

Fr. 20.00      

  • Silke Helfrich: Wealth throught Sharing – the actual status of the commons-movement (Presentation / Discussion 45/15’). A paper on this topic may be obtained from Böll-Foundation (info@boell.de)

Sa. 9:00 – 10:30

  • Susanne Gura: The contribution of Farmers’ Rights towards maintaining common goods - case study  (Presentation / Discussion 30/15’)
  • Lorenz Bachmann: Free Access to Seed, the example of Masipag, Philippines
  • Evelyn Mathias: The Livestock Keepers Rights and the state of their implementation (Presentation / Discussion 30/15’)
  • Gebhard Rosmanith: Open Source - Breeding - how can it be financed? (Presentation / Discussion 30/15’)

Sa. 14:00 – 15:30

  • Walk around Dottenfelder Hof, visit of the seed breeding in the research section

Coffee and cake

Sa 16:30 – 18:30

  • Gregor Kaiser / Johannes Kotschi: Open-Source Models for seed – how could a „Biolinux“ function? (Präsentation / Diskussion 30/15

Supper

Sa 20:00

  • AGRECOL Information session and informal get together

So 9:00 – 10:30

  • group work

Tea/Coffee Break

So 10:30 – 12:00

  • Plenary Presentation und Discussion of results of group work

So 12:00  Closing, possibly joint lunch

The meeting took place at Dottenfelder Hof,   http://www.dottenfelderhof.de/dottenfelderhof.html, a well established Eco-farm. Lively discussions centred around the questions, whether one should aim at changing the legal frame for breeding, reviving the ideas of "common goods", or to issue licences for "Open Source" varieties. On fincancing, the concept of crowd funding, a mechanism of collecting funds through internet, was raised as an option. A  documentation of the findings, though only in German, is attached below:

 

Presentations, Discussions and Follow-Up of the meeting

 

For further discussions, please

Contact: Johannes Kotschi, E-mail: kotschi@t-online.de

Thursday, 17. May 2012 - 17:00 - Sunday, 20. May 2012 - 13:00

The Family meeting spring 2012 took place in Schmochtitz near Bautzen in Oberlausitz, Saxony, from May 17 to 20, 2012. The theme of the meeting was:

The Conflict between Agriculture and Protection of Nature exemplified by the most recent migration of Wolves into the Area of Lausitz.

Maintaining biological diversity and protecting nature are more and more important themes in Middle and Eastern Europe. In the cause of increased efforts in these fields, the populations of wolves have increased as well. Young wolves move in in the search for mating partners, often over long trails. Distances of 500 km are not unusual. Thus, wolves came back into Oberlausitz twelve years ago, to make it their new habitat. This has impacts on farmers, hunters, foresters and providers of tourism in the region.

In our meeting, we talked to representatives of those affected, to learn their views on problems and chances resulting from the in-migration of wolves. And, of course, we also acquainted ourselves intensively with our new neighbour, the wolf: Which packs of wolves exist in the region, where do they come from, where do they move to, what are they feeding on, how do the hunt, and how do they react towards humans and their livestock.

Furthermore, we took the case of wolf migration to have a look at the theme "Nature versus Agriculture", which more and more moves into focus worldwide. How much "wild habitat" can agriculture tolerate?, are there forms of landuse, which are more compatible with protection of nature?, which sensible arrangement could ease potential conflicts between agriculture and protection of nature? These are some of the questions we raised and discussed, also in view of our own experiences with the theme in development co-operation.

Our Programme:

  • Thursday: Arrival, supper, introductory presentations, market with short  presentations
  • Friday: Contact office wolf region of Lausitz, excursion on wolf tracks
  • Saturday: Visiting Bio-Farmers, adventure hiking on the nature trail near Guttau
  • Sunday:  Presentations by AGRECOL in-service students, annual meeting of AGRECOL members, visit to Bautzen and departure after lunch.

Additional information on the issues may be obtained from some interesting articles (in german) from "Schafzucht", the journal for sheep and goat farmers.

 

AnhangGröße
Wolf-Schweiz001.jpg343.54 KB
Wolf-Schweiz002.jpg371.31 KB
Wolf-Schweiz003.jpg363.58 KB
Wolf-Schweiz004.jpg359.35 KB
Wolf-Schweiz005.jpg377.21 KB
Wolf-Schweiz006.jpg348.9 KB
Wolf-Meck-Pomm001.jpg303.32 KB
Wolf-Meck-Pomm002.jpg352.55 KB
Wolf-Meck-Pomm003.jpg362.68 KB
Herde-Hund-Wolf005.jpg372.25 KB
Herde-Hund-Wolf006.jpg333.03 KB
Friday, 14. October 2011 - 18:00 - Sunday, 16. October 2011 - 14:00

 

The working session of Autumn 2011 took place from October 14 to October 16, 2011 in Stuttgart. The theme of the meeting was  CO2 trade and its effects on sustainable land use and small holder agriculture.

Below we enclose the papers presented during the meeting, and some further documents which might be of interest.

Presentations of the meeting

Introductory presentation by Felix Nickel: Hintergrund, EU-Emissionshandel, Klimaschutzprojekte

 

 

 

RP-cov

Presentation by Reinhard Pfeiffer: CO2 mitigation - AFOLU

 

 

 

Presentation by Marlis Kees: Carbon Markets for Improved Cooking Stoves

 

 

Further documents, referred to during out discussions:

Deutsche Bank research: Mitigating climate change through agriculture
Meridian Institute: Agriculture and Climate Change: a scoping report: 1. full report, 2. executive summary

 

Accompanying  documents

The website of Carbonwatch contains many interesting contributions and readers about  carbon trade: http://www.carbontradewatch.org/

Also interesting are several comments and further articles published in taz on the debate about Yasuni, including a comment by Dirk Niebel:

About the same issue, there are further articles in taz:

 

If you have further documents which may be of interest please sent them to thomas.becker@agrecol.de .

 

Thursday, 2. June 2011 - 16:00 - Sunday, 5. June 2011 - 13:00

The meeting, with families, took place from June 2 to 5, 2011 in Kehl on River Rhine. Theme: Fishery, River bed regulation and flood management

River bed regulation has led to great changes on river Rhine near Kehl over the last fourty years, to the disadvantage of nature and the landscape, but also of fishery. Professional fishery on river Rhine was abandoned after the last professional fisher died few years ago. The Fishery Association of Goldscheuer near Kehl endevours to maintain favourable condition for fish stock, or, to re-establish such conditions after flood protection installations have been put in place. Thereby, fishery sees itself in conflicting situations with the administration for water and flood management,  but also against business interests, such as shipping, excavation of river sands and agriculture, and against the interests of protection of nature groups.  We learnt about history, present and future of fishery on river Rhine during that weekend.

Thursday: Arrival, Introduction to the topic: The Rhine river bed regulation of Tulla and its effects 

Friday: History of Goldscheuer, a village of fischers and gold washers,

Visit to Straßburg

Saturday: Fischery on river Rhine today ,

AGRECOL–Members meeting

Sunday: Presentations by AGRECOL-Inservice students,

Lunch, Departure

 

For further information and registration please contact AGRECOL.

Friday, 15. October 2010 - 2:00 - Sunday, 17. October 2010 - 2:00
 
We held the working session of 2010 at Dottenfelder Hof in Bad Vilbel from October 15 to 17. The theme was Soil fertility. Normally, the farm does not host any workshops, but for us, or rather the main organiser, Johannes Kotschi, the farm community made an exception. Accommodation was spartanic, and we prepared breakfast and supper ourselves at the farm-school. However, living and working together for two intensive days created a very warm atmosphere.

We were all very much taken with the farm and the many-fold actitivities of the farm community – besides bio-dynamic agriculture with cereals, vegetables, fruits and livestock (about 80 dairy cattle plus pigs and poultry) there are a bakery, cheese making, a restaurant, a farm shop, the agricultural college, research and, further more, various events for people from around.  We enjoyed the freshly pressed apple juice and the many other farm products. During the tour through farm and fields, and later-on while having coffee, we had lively discussions with bio-farmer Martin van Mackensen over many different topics, from compost making to decision making in the farm community, which is composed of several families. We were impressed, that the managers of the farm keep to the principles of the founding father of DEMETER eco-farming Rudolf Steiner, but react pragmatically on practical issues. And for other climatic zones than Germany, they can admit, that there, extracts from stinging nettles may probably need to be replaced by extracts from other plants.

The programme for the weekend was a well balanced mixture of presentations, discussions, group work and visits. Joachim Raupp brought an overview over biological-dynamic methods of agriculture, from a scientific point of view (he has long-standing experience in research), above all about the effect of bio-dynamic extracts on root growth. Johannes talked about use of mineral fertilizers in the ecological intensification of Agriculture, a study he made recently on behalf of AGRECOL. Berthold Schrimpf and Johannes contributed their observations on „Conservation farming“ in the tropics. Willem Stoop reported about the relation between SRI (System of Rice Intensification) and soil fertility. In group work sessions, we exchanged further experiences with „ecological intensification“ and  „conservation agriculture“ in smallholder agriculture at  sub-humid and semiarid locations – and one group dealt with the question what actually is being intensified with „ecological intensification“ ( and proposed Knowledge and Creativity).

Many thanks to Johannes, who organised the session thematically and logistically, and to Jochen Currle and Georg Dürr for the moderation during the seminar. We also thank Martin van Mackensen for the guided tours and the discussion about the life and makings at  Dottenfelder Hof and Reinhard Lübbert from the agricultural college for organising our accommodation and food.

 

for further information please contact:  

kotschi@agrecol.de